ECOVACS GOAT G1-800: smarter purchase without cables – or already outdated today?
The ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 was one of the models that really drew attention to the market for boundary wire-free robotic mowers. While many competing models still relied heavily on traditional wire installation, ECOVACS introduced a concept of wireless boundary setting, navigation beacons, app mapping, camera support, and intelligent obstacle avoidance. This made the G1-800 extremely exciting for many buyers. No boundary wire, modern technology, plus 800 m² area class – this sounded and still sounds much more attractive to many than the old wired world.
But for this very reason, the GOAT G1-800 must be evaluated soberly. It is a model that thrives on first impressions. On paper, it looks modern. In suitable gardens, it can indeed be pleasant. At the same time, forums, Reddit, and real user reports clearly show that the G1-800 does not operate as elegantly in every garden as marketing suggests. Additionally, there is a second, very important level: The GOAT G1-800 was a pioneering model. This is exciting, but it also means that it is now measured more against modern successors than it was at launch.
So the real question is not just whether the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 was or is good. The more important question is: Is this concept still worthwhile today, where newer models have further developed many aspects? Or are you ultimately buying an interesting but already somewhat outdated system here?
Technical Basis: What the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 actually offers
The GOAT G1-800 is designed for lawns up to 800 m². Officially, ECOVACS states a mowing performance of 100 to 150 m² per hour for the model, a cutting width of 22 cm, a cutting height of 3 to 6 cm, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, as well as the ability to create up to 16 mowing zones in the app. The navigation does not work with classic RTK like the newer O-models, but with a system of VSLAM, UWB, and navigation beacons. Additionally, it features AIVI-3D obstacle avoidance, two cameras, and a 360-degree garden monitoring function.
The crucial aspect of the GOAT G1-800 is not just that it operates without boundary wires. But how it does so. It does not rely on free visual boundary recognition like many newer vision systems, nor on RTK antennas plus LiDAR like current mid-range and high-end models. Instead, it works with navigation beacons that must be placed in the garden so that the system can get proper orientation. This is its technological core – and later also one of its biggest practical drawbacks.
The basic idea was and is attractive. Those who do not want boundary wires immediately see the appeal here. At the same time, this technology is no longer as future-proof as it was at market launch, because newer systems have noticeably advanced in some areas.
The greatest strength: wireless, modern, and significantly more convenient for many gardens than wire
The biggest advantage of the GOAT G1-800 is clear: no boundary wire. For many buyers, this is precisely the point at which the model becomes interesting. No laying cables, no searching for wire breaks, no later corrections after modifications, no typical installation of old cable robots – this is a real comfort gain in everyday life. Especially when first entering the world of robotic mowers, this significantly lowers the barrier.
Additionally, there is the fundamentally logical mowing planning. The GOAT G1-800 does not simply want to drive randomly through the garden, but to systematically and understandably work through the area. In suitable gardens, this is a real advantage, as it makes the lawn appear more calm and evenly maintained. Many buyers coming from older or simpler robots perceive this as a noticeable improvement.
Obstacle avoidance is also one of the things that must be fairly credited to the device. The AIVI-3D system is not just a marketing detail. In tests and user reports, obstacle detection is generally seen as a strength, especially compared to simpler robots that only react after contact. For family gardens with furniture, toys, or changing objects, this is a relevant point.
For which gardens the G1-800 really fits well
The GOAT G1-800 is best suited for gardens up to about 800 m² that are not completely trivial but also not chaotic in layout. A main area, perhaps a secondary area, clear transitions, and good visibility for the beacons – this is where the system feels most comfortable. If your garden is large enough that a simple entry-level robot seems too limited, but not so complex that you would today rather opt for a very advanced RTK model, the G1-800 can indeed make sense.
It also fits buyers who place a high value on the comfort advantage of “without wire.” Because that is where its market logic lies. Those who hate or want to avoid boundary wires get a system here that is fundamentally modern and, in many cases, easier to start than a classic wire robot. Especially for users who are tech-savvy enough to handle app, mapping, and beacon logic, this can be attractive.
The relatively large range of functions is also a plus point. App control, zone management, schedules, safety features, camera monitoring, and the ability to manage the garden digitally make the G1-800 overall more modern than many classic models in its price range. Those who want more than just a simple lawn mower will find an interesting package here.
What really convinces in tests and positive user opinions
One must concede that the G1-800 had real arguments at its market launch. In tests, the high-quality workmanship, app control, and the overall modern user experience were positively mentioned. The idea of additionally using the robot as a garden monitoring device was more than just a gimmick for many users. The concept seemed new, technically exciting, and surprisingly smart for a robotic mower.
It is also positive that the wireless concept fundamentally works. The G1-800 is not just a marketing product that only looks good on the box. There are indeed users who are satisfied with the model. The picture is not black or white. This makes the assessment more realistic: The G1-800 is not a total failure, but it is also not a mower that fits every garden equally well.
Another real advantage: The model is often significantly cheaper today than modern RTK successors. This makes it interesting. Because if the price is noticeably lower than newer alternatives, the G1-800 becomes relevant again – not as a technological leader, but as a cheaper entry into the wireless robotic mower world.
The real weakness: The system stands and falls with the beacons
And here begins the part that is more important for the purchasing decision than any advertising message. The GOAT G1-800 relies on its navigation beacons and mapping functioning properly. However, this is precisely where real user problems accumulate. On Reddit and in specialized communities, reports frequently emerge that mapping fails, that beacons are not recognized properly despite initially strong signals, or that area coverage appears unreliable in everyday use.
This is not a small peripheral issue, but one of the central themes of the GOAT G1-800. Because unlike a wire robot, where a properly laid cable often brings long-term peace, much here depends on radio coverage, visibility conditions, and the correct distribution of beacons. This can work well. But it can also be precisely the point where a modern-looking mower becomes an annoying project.
For this reason, the G1-800 is not a model for buyers who want to think as little as possible. The system can be elegant when everything works out cleanly. If not, the comfort advantage quickly becomes smaller than it initially sounds.
The real problems: What users are really bothered by in everyday life
1. Mapping errors and beacon problems are not an isolated case
The most frequent and important problem area of the GOAT G1-800 concerns mapping and the beacons. Several users report that while the system initially looks good, it later fails during mapping, does not recognize beacons properly anymore, or becomes unnecessarily complicated during re-setup. This makes the robot more exhausting for some buyers than it appears at first glance.
If you have a garden where the beacons can only be positioned narrowly or visibility relationships are difficult, you should take this point seriously. The G1-800 is not a device that should be blindly read as “wireless and therefore automatically easier.”
2. The edges remain a real weak point
Another recurring criticism concerns edge mowing. Tests describe that depending on the garden situation, a visible edge residue may remain if there are no easily traversable edges. Real user opinions also mention that the G1-800 stops too early at some edges, necessitating touch-ups with the trimmer.
This is very relevant for everyday life. Because with a robotic mower, you not only see if the area is generally short, but also how clean the edges look. Those who place great value on well-maintained edges should not be too optimistic about the GOAT G1-800. The trimmer remains part of the routine in many gardens.
3. Complex gardens and dense planting are not its favorite environment
The G1-800 appears more convincing in simple to moderately complex gardens than in properties with many angles, narrow passages, strong visual interruptions, or very intricate layouts. This is precisely where the likelihood increases that the beacon system and area logic become more cumbersome than marketing suggests.
Narrow edge areas, many small secondary sectors, or changing garden structures can also reduce comfort. This does not mean that the G1-800 cannot handle such areas at all. It just means: It is significantly less straightforward there than the concept without wires initially suggests.
4. The app is well thought out, but not good enough for everyone
The app is on paper one of the strengths of the GOAT G1-800. In tests, it is sometimes explicitly praised. At the same time, there is real user criticism regarding the quality of the software and the overall usability logic. Some criticize that errors such as mapping interruptions or beacon problems are not explained transparently enough in the app, making the overall behavior unnecessarily frustrating.
The fair assessment is therefore: The app is feature-rich and fundamentally modern, but it does not seem so mature that it could be sold without reservation as “simply perfect.” Those who are tech-savvy will cope better with it. Those who want maximum clarity and zero troubleshooting should be more cautious.
5. Long-term everyday tolerance appears mixed compared to the first impression
A particularly honest point is the long-term perception. There are users who were initially satisfied and later became more critical. This is particularly important for robotic mowers because a device must not only appear modern at the start but should also operate quietly, predictably, and robustly over weeks and months. This is precisely where the G1-800 does not seem equally convincing to every user.
This does not mean that the model is fundamentally unreliable. It means, however, that one should formulate more cautiously about the GOAT G1-800 than about more mature successors. Those who buy today are no longer purchasing the big technology newcomer, but an older system with known strengths and known limitations.
How good is the mowing performance in everyday life really?
If the garden is suitable, the mowing performance of the GOAT G1-800 is good. This is the fair assessment. The 22 cm cutting width fits well with the 800 m² class, the systematic mowing planning is clearly more modern than with random robots, and in suitable areas, you get a decent, even result. Especially those coming from an older wire robot or a simple entry-level model will notice the difference.
But here too, the GOAT G1-800 is a maintenance mower, not a problem solver for chaotic areas. It wants to mow regularly, have clean zones, and an environment that fits the sensors. In difficult gardens, the situation quickly looks less shiny. Then small navigation inaccuracies, edge strips, or beacon weaknesses suddenly become real everyday annoyances.
It is also important that the G1-800 can no longer be viewed in isolation today. Compared to newer RTK or LiDAR models, it simply appears like an earlier generation in some respects. This does not mean that it is bad. But one should no longer evaluate it as the technological spearhead.
Is the GOAT G1-800 still worthwhile today – or clearly outdated?
This is precisely where the most exciting question lies. Because the GOAT G1-800 was attractive as a pioneering model. Today, however, there are newer systems that are significantly further ahead in some areas. These include more precise RTK solutions, more modern LiDAR support, or vision systems that do not rely on beacons. As a result, the G1-800 no longer automatically appears as the logical wireless purchase, but rather as an older yet still interesting interim solution.
This means concretely: The G1-800 is worthwhile primarily if you can get it noticeably cheaper and your garden fits well with the beacon concept. Then it can still be a clever purchase. However, if the price is too close to newer alternatives, the recommendation becomes more difficult. Because then you are not just buying a robot, but also an older system logic with all its known peculiarities.
The G1-800 appears outdated especially where newer models fulfill the same promises with less beacon dependence, better edge behavior, or more mature navigation. Not completely obsolete, but also no longer the benchmark it once aimed to be.
Is the price worth it?
This strongly depends on the price at which you can get the GOAT G1-800. If it is offered significantly cheaper than modern RTK or current wireless competitors, it remains interesting. Then you get a fundamentally modern, wireless concept with a good functional basis, decent mowing performance, and a comfort level that many classic cable robots do not offer.
If, on the other hand, the price remains too high or is too close to newer alternatives, the calculation tips. Then the weaknesses become more visible: beacon dependence, edge residues, mixed long-term experiences, and the fact that the system can no longer be considered the most modern on the market today. For this reason, the price is more decisive for the G1-800 than for many other models.
For whom the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is a good choice
For gardens up to about 800 m² with sensible beacon coverage
For buyers who do not want to lay boundary wire
For users looking for a cheaper entry into the wireless class
For rather clear to moderately complex areas without extreme edge problems
For people who can handle app, mapping, and occasional adjustments
When you should better keep searching
If your garden is densely planted, heavily nested, or very difficult to layout
If visible edge strips particularly bother you
If you want as little system maintenance and troubleshooting as possible
If the price is hardly below modern alternatives
If you are looking for maximum maturity and as little beacon dependence as possible
Conclusion: clever purchase or already outdated?
The ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is not a bad product. It was and is an interesting robotic mower, especially because it seriously brought the topic of “without boundary wire” to the mass market early on. In suitable gardens, at a reasonable price, and with some technical patience, it can still be a sensible purchase today. Its strengths clearly lie in the wireless concept, the modern app idea, good obstacle detection, and the overall smart approach.
At the same time, it is not a model that should be blindly repurchased today. The real criticism regarding mapping, beacons, edge strips, and app transparency is too clear to downplay. Additionally, there are now more modern successors and alternatives that appear more mature in important aspects. For this reason, the G1-800 is less of a must-buy today and more of a model that heavily depends on price and garden type.
In summary, the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is a clever purchase if you know that your garden fits the system and the price is attractive enough. It appears outdated especially if you buy it at the wrong price or expect that an older beacon system will automatically run as smoothly as the better newer solutions today.
Short purchase recommendation in one sentence
The ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is worthwhile today primarily as a cheaper wireless entry for suitable gardens – as a technically leading or particularly worry-free solution, it is now significantly less clear.
ECOVACS GOAT G1-800: smart purchase without cables – or already outdated today?
ECOVACS GOAT G1-800: smarter purchase without cables – or already outdated today?
The ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 was one of the models that really drew attention to the market for boundary wire-free robotic mowers. While many competing models still relied heavily on traditional wire installation, ECOVACS introduced a concept of wireless boundary setting, navigation beacons, app mapping, camera support, and intelligent obstacle avoidance. This made the G1-800 extremely exciting for many buyers. No boundary wire, modern technology, plus 800 m² area class – this sounded and still sounds much more attractive to many than the old wired world.
But for this very reason, the GOAT G1-800 must be evaluated soberly. It is a model that thrives on first impressions. On paper, it looks modern. In suitable gardens, it can indeed be pleasant. At the same time, forums, Reddit, and real user reports clearly show that the G1-800 does not operate as elegantly in every garden as marketing suggests. Additionally, there is a second, very important level: The GOAT G1-800 was a pioneering model. This is exciting, but it also means that it is now measured more against modern successors than it was at launch.
So the real question is not just whether the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 was or is good. The more important question is: Is this concept still worthwhile today, where newer models have further developed many aspects? Or are you ultimately buying an interesting but already somewhat outdated system here?
Technical Basis: What the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 actually offers
The GOAT G1-800 is designed for lawns up to 800 m². Officially, ECOVACS states a mowing performance of 100 to 150 m² per hour for the model, a cutting width of 22 cm, a cutting height of 3 to 6 cm, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, as well as the ability to create up to 16 mowing zones in the app. The navigation does not work with classic RTK like the newer O-models, but with a system of VSLAM, UWB, and navigation beacons. Additionally, it features AIVI-3D obstacle avoidance, two cameras, and a 360-degree garden monitoring function.
The crucial aspect of the GOAT G1-800 is not just that it operates without boundary wires. But how it does so. It does not rely on free visual boundary recognition like many newer vision systems, nor on RTK antennas plus LiDAR like current mid-range and high-end models. Instead, it works with navigation beacons that must be placed in the garden so that the system can get proper orientation. This is its technological core – and later also one of its biggest practical drawbacks.
The basic idea was and is attractive. Those who do not want boundary wires immediately see the appeal here. At the same time, this technology is no longer as future-proof as it was at market launch, because newer systems have noticeably advanced in some areas.
The greatest strength: wireless, modern, and significantly more convenient for many gardens than wire
The biggest advantage of the GOAT G1-800 is clear: no boundary wire. For many buyers, this is precisely the point at which the model becomes interesting. No laying cables, no searching for wire breaks, no later corrections after modifications, no typical installation of old cable robots – this is a real comfort gain in everyday life. Especially when first entering the world of robotic mowers, this significantly lowers the barrier.
Additionally, there is the fundamentally logical mowing planning. The GOAT G1-800 does not simply want to drive randomly through the garden, but to systematically and understandably work through the area. In suitable gardens, this is a real advantage, as it makes the lawn appear more calm and evenly maintained. Many buyers coming from older or simpler robots perceive this as a noticeable improvement.
Obstacle avoidance is also one of the things that must be fairly credited to the device. The AIVI-3D system is not just a marketing detail. In tests and user reports, obstacle detection is generally seen as a strength, especially compared to simpler robots that only react after contact. For family gardens with furniture, toys, or changing objects, this is a relevant point.
For which gardens the G1-800 really fits well
The GOAT G1-800 is best suited for gardens up to about 800 m² that are not completely trivial but also not chaotic in layout. A main area, perhaps a secondary area, clear transitions, and good visibility for the beacons – this is where the system feels most comfortable. If your garden is large enough that a simple entry-level robot seems too limited, but not so complex that you would today rather opt for a very advanced RTK model, the G1-800 can indeed make sense.
It also fits buyers who place a high value on the comfort advantage of “without wire.” Because that is where its market logic lies. Those who hate or want to avoid boundary wires get a system here that is fundamentally modern and, in many cases, easier to start than a classic wire robot. Especially for users who are tech-savvy enough to handle app, mapping, and beacon logic, this can be attractive.
The relatively large range of functions is also a plus point. App control, zone management, schedules, safety features, camera monitoring, and the ability to manage the garden digitally make the G1-800 overall more modern than many classic models in its price range. Those who want more than just a simple lawn mower will find an interesting package here.
What really convinces in tests and positive user opinions
One must concede that the G1-800 had real arguments at its market launch. In tests, the high-quality workmanship, app control, and the overall modern user experience were positively mentioned. The idea of additionally using the robot as a garden monitoring device was more than just a gimmick for many users. The concept seemed new, technically exciting, and surprisingly smart for a robotic mower.
It is also positive that the wireless concept fundamentally works. The G1-800 is not just a marketing product that only looks good on the box. There are indeed users who are satisfied with the model. The picture is not black or white. This makes the assessment more realistic: The G1-800 is not a total failure, but it is also not a mower that fits every garden equally well.
Another real advantage: The model is often significantly cheaper today than modern RTK successors. This makes it interesting. Because if the price is noticeably lower than newer alternatives, the G1-800 becomes relevant again – not as a technological leader, but as a cheaper entry into the wireless robotic mower world.
The real weakness: The system stands and falls with the beacons
And here begins the part that is more important for the purchasing decision than any advertising message. The GOAT G1-800 relies on its navigation beacons and mapping functioning properly. However, this is precisely where real user problems accumulate. On Reddit and in specialized communities, reports frequently emerge that mapping fails, that beacons are not recognized properly despite initially strong signals, or that area coverage appears unreliable in everyday use.
This is not a small peripheral issue, but one of the central themes of the GOAT G1-800. Because unlike a wire robot, where a properly laid cable often brings long-term peace, much here depends on radio coverage, visibility conditions, and the correct distribution of beacons. This can work well. But it can also be precisely the point where a modern-looking mower becomes an annoying project.
For this reason, the G1-800 is not a model for buyers who want to think as little as possible. The system can be elegant when everything works out cleanly. If not, the comfort advantage quickly becomes smaller than it initially sounds.
The real problems: What users are really bothered by in everyday life
1. Mapping errors and beacon problems are not an isolated case
The most frequent and important problem area of the GOAT G1-800 concerns mapping and the beacons. Several users report that while the system initially looks good, it later fails during mapping, does not recognize beacons properly anymore, or becomes unnecessarily complicated during re-setup. This makes the robot more exhausting for some buyers than it appears at first glance.
If you have a garden where the beacons can only be positioned narrowly or visibility relationships are difficult, you should take this point seriously. The G1-800 is not a device that should be blindly read as “wireless and therefore automatically easier.”
2. The edges remain a real weak point
Another recurring criticism concerns edge mowing. Tests describe that depending on the garden situation, a visible edge residue may remain if there are no easily traversable edges. Real user opinions also mention that the G1-800 stops too early at some edges, necessitating touch-ups with the trimmer.
This is very relevant for everyday life. Because with a robotic mower, you not only see if the area is generally short, but also how clean the edges look. Those who place great value on well-maintained edges should not be too optimistic about the GOAT G1-800. The trimmer remains part of the routine in many gardens.
3. Complex gardens and dense planting are not its favorite environment
The G1-800 appears more convincing in simple to moderately complex gardens than in properties with many angles, narrow passages, strong visual interruptions, or very intricate layouts. This is precisely where the likelihood increases that the beacon system and area logic become more cumbersome than marketing suggests.
Narrow edge areas, many small secondary sectors, or changing garden structures can also reduce comfort. This does not mean that the G1-800 cannot handle such areas at all. It just means: It is significantly less straightforward there than the concept without wires initially suggests.
4. The app is well thought out, but not good enough for everyone
The app is on paper one of the strengths of the GOAT G1-800. In tests, it is sometimes explicitly praised. At the same time, there is real user criticism regarding the quality of the software and the overall usability logic. Some criticize that errors such as mapping interruptions or beacon problems are not explained transparently enough in the app, making the overall behavior unnecessarily frustrating.
The fair assessment is therefore: The app is feature-rich and fundamentally modern, but it does not seem so mature that it could be sold without reservation as “simply perfect.” Those who are tech-savvy will cope better with it. Those who want maximum clarity and zero troubleshooting should be more cautious.
5. Long-term everyday tolerance appears mixed compared to the first impression
A particularly honest point is the long-term perception. There are users who were initially satisfied and later became more critical. This is particularly important for robotic mowers because a device must not only appear modern at the start but should also operate quietly, predictably, and robustly over weeks and months. This is precisely where the G1-800 does not seem equally convincing to every user.
This does not mean that the model is fundamentally unreliable. It means, however, that one should formulate more cautiously about the GOAT G1-800 than about more mature successors. Those who buy today are no longer purchasing the big technology newcomer, but an older system with known strengths and known limitations.
How good is the mowing performance in everyday life really?
If the garden is suitable, the mowing performance of the GOAT G1-800 is good. This is the fair assessment. The 22 cm cutting width fits well with the 800 m² class, the systematic mowing planning is clearly more modern than with random robots, and in suitable areas, you get a decent, even result. Especially those coming from an older wire robot or a simple entry-level model will notice the difference.
But here too, the GOAT G1-800 is a maintenance mower, not a problem solver for chaotic areas. It wants to mow regularly, have clean zones, and an environment that fits the sensors. In difficult gardens, the situation quickly looks less shiny. Then small navigation inaccuracies, edge strips, or beacon weaknesses suddenly become real everyday annoyances.
It is also important that the G1-800 can no longer be viewed in isolation today. Compared to newer RTK or LiDAR models, it simply appears like an earlier generation in some respects. This does not mean that it is bad. But one should no longer evaluate it as the technological spearhead.
Is the GOAT G1-800 still worthwhile today – or clearly outdated?
This is precisely where the most exciting question lies. Because the GOAT G1-800 was attractive as a pioneering model. Today, however, there are newer systems that are significantly further ahead in some areas. These include more precise RTK solutions, more modern LiDAR support, or vision systems that do not rely on beacons. As a result, the G1-800 no longer automatically appears as the logical wireless purchase, but rather as an older yet still interesting interim solution.
This means concretely: The G1-800 is worthwhile primarily if you can get it noticeably cheaper and your garden fits well with the beacon concept. Then it can still be a clever purchase. However, if the price is too close to newer alternatives, the recommendation becomes more difficult. Because then you are not just buying a robot, but also an older system logic with all its known peculiarities.
The G1-800 appears outdated especially where newer models fulfill the same promises with less beacon dependence, better edge behavior, or more mature navigation. Not completely obsolete, but also no longer the benchmark it once aimed to be.
Is the price worth it?
This strongly depends on the price at which you can get the GOAT G1-800. If it is offered significantly cheaper than modern RTK or current wireless competitors, it remains interesting. Then you get a fundamentally modern, wireless concept with a good functional basis, decent mowing performance, and a comfort level that many classic cable robots do not offer.
If, on the other hand, the price remains too high or is too close to newer alternatives, the calculation tips. Then the weaknesses become more visible: beacon dependence, edge residues, mixed long-term experiences, and the fact that the system can no longer be considered the most modern on the market today. For this reason, the price is more decisive for the G1-800 than for many other models.
For whom the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is a good choice
When you should better keep searching
Conclusion: clever purchase or already outdated?
The ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is not a bad product. It was and is an interesting robotic mower, especially because it seriously brought the topic of “without boundary wire” to the mass market early on. In suitable gardens, at a reasonable price, and with some technical patience, it can still be a sensible purchase today. Its strengths clearly lie in the wireless concept, the modern app idea, good obstacle detection, and the overall smart approach.
At the same time, it is not a model that should be blindly repurchased today. The real criticism regarding mapping, beacons, edge strips, and app transparency is too clear to downplay. Additionally, there are now more modern successors and alternatives that appear more mature in important aspects. For this reason, the G1-800 is less of a must-buy today and more of a model that heavily depends on price and garden type.
In summary, the ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is a clever purchase if you know that your garden fits the system and the price is attractive enough. It appears outdated especially if you buy it at the wrong price or expect that an older beacon system will automatically run as smoothly as the better newer solutions today.
Short purchase recommendation in one sentence
The ECOVACS GOAT G1-800 is worthwhile today primarily as a cheaper wireless entry for suitable gardens – as a technically leading or particularly worry-free solution, it is now significantly less clear.